Podcasting 2.0 for February 28th, 2025, episode
212.
A song is born.
Hello, everybody.
Hello, podcasters.
Hello, developers.
Hello, interested people.
Welcome to Podcasting 2.0. It is the
board meeting that takes place every week where
we discuss everything about podcasting, the past, the
future, and what is yet to come.
We are, in fact, the only boardroom that
never reviews the meeting notes.
I'm Adam Curry here in the heart of
the Texas hill country and in Alabama, the
man who will squeeze a banner into any
app.
Say hello to my friend on the other
end, the one, the only, Mr. Dave Jones.
Is it the Fauci wheeze or the Fauci
squeeze?
No, it's the Fauci wheeze.
There we go.
That's what I sounded like two days ago.
Yeah, man.
So last week you were, there you go.
You had the onset of the flu.
The onset.
I like that word, onset.
Well, it was the onset.
It makes it sound so dire, though.
You were an onset of something.
Yeah, you were.
What's the term they use during COVID?
You were, honestly, pre-infection.
No, when you're infected but it doesn't show.
Yeah, yeah.
It's a silent killer.
What was that term again?
I forget the term.
Silent spreader.
No, no, that wasn't it.
It was.
Pre-symptomatic.
Asymptomatic.
Asymptomatic spread.
Yes, there it is.
Asymptomatic spread.
Yes, yes, yes.
Oh, yeah.
I was just spreading it all over the
place and none the wiser.
You were typhoid Mary.
Yes.
Did you stay home or did you go
to work?
Well, I went back to the office Friday.
By the time I got back to the
office, I was running a fever.
I stayed there for about an hour and
then left home.
Super spreader.
Yes, super spreader.
Exactly.
You went ahead, contaminated everybody.
How's the rest of the office?
Is the office closed now?
Is that the general idea?
No.
Then I was like, guys, I can't handle
this anymore.
I feel so bad, so I just left
and went home.
I ran a fever through Tuesday and then
it broke sometime Tuesday afternoon and now I'm
kind of coming out of it.
It's all just a bunch of congestion now.
Well, if it helps any, you sound like
crap.
Thanks.
Just to let you know.
It's what I was aiming at.
I hit my target.
Mission accomplished.
Yeah.
So I was in Dallas all week.
I haven't had any sort of debrief at
all from you other than it was great.
I figured I'd give you a debrief on
the show as it pertains to podcasting.
Yay.
So first of all, this is the National
Religious Broadcasters Conference.
There's 5,000 people at this conference.
That's a lot of people.
How did it compare size-wise just based
on your feel to something like Podcast Movement?
At least twice as big.
I mean, they had multiple ballrooms, a lot
less of the small tracks really.
I mean, this was at the Gaylord Hotel
in Grapevine, Texas, a little outside of Dallas,
which is a big hotel.
It's like a biodome.
Is it one like in Nashville?
Like in Nashville that has the whole –
it's got like a river in it.
Oh, yeah, the train set that runs through
the whole place.
Yeah, a biodome, air pumped in.
You don't need to leave to go to
a restaurant.
They've got everything there.
At a certain point, I walked outside.
It had that kind of casino vibe, like
I need to feel some actual air.
I just didn't feel right.
So I was there to do a couple
of things.
I was scheduled for two keynotes.
And the one that I did, I guess
they were equally as big.
They were in a ballroom.
The ballroom was pretty full.
Compared to Podcast Movement, we had at least
100 times more people.
Yay, yay.
Now, was this a keynote on a particular
track?
How did they have this organized?
Well, they had keynotes every single morning for
every morning session.
So this one, although I was there Monday
and Tuesday, the Wednesday was my keynote day.
So I had a keynote in the morning
and a keynote right after lunch.
Pay attention, Podcast Movement, right after lunch.
So the first one was scheduled as kind
of a fireside chat.
It was my favorite format.
Oh, nice.
Yes, fireside chat.
Is there a fire?
The fire was in my heart, Dave Jones.
I got you.
So I had asked John Fuller if he
would do that with me, which meant he
would basically be chatting with me.
Now, John Fuller is from Focus on the
Family.
We know him because he's been a podcaster
since 2005 or 2006.
Their suite of programs reaches millions of people
every single day.
You've known him personally for a long time,
right?
Yeah, many years.
And I met him a couple of times
in person.
And everybody in the business knows John Fuller,
everybody.
He's been on air for a long time.
And I'm not quite sure what his title
is.
He's a big boss over there.
I'm not quite sure what his title is.
He and Rob Kirkpatrick, I think you met
both of them at Podcast Movement.
They were there as well.
Oh, okay.
That is his title, Big Boss.
Big Boss.
I think it's actually Big Kahuna, I think
is his business card.
And I had told him many – I
had given him my local pitch several times.
And we had discussed this.
He was really fantastic.
I mean, this guy, he knows exactly how
to do this stuff.
He's a radio guy.
So my whole pitch was about the future
– well, the title of the session was
The Future of Radio is Local.
And there were a lot of heads nodding.
Everybody was in agreement.
You know, how all radio pretty much has
given up on local programming.
They've succumbed, if you will, to national programming,
which is all syndicated.
They really don't have the budgets anymore in
many cases to – you know, just for
the nature of radio advertising.
And, of course, many of these stations, probably
the majority, don't actually have advertising.
So I'll talk about that.
It's an important difference with any other conference
I've been to.
But when it comes to the importance of
local, as I've said about podcasts, the radio
guys get it.
They're all like, yeah.
And then when I tell them, hey, you
know, for you, it's real easy to find
a partner in local programming, and that's the
content factory known as your local church.
And it was really good.
And, of course, along with that comes our
Godcaster solution, which I need to talk about
because I learned so many important things, and
there's so much that would pertain to what
we're doing in podcasting 2.0 and people
building podcast experiences in general.
So it was, you know, Fuller was nice
enough to just keep mentioning Godcaster because you're
not supposed to pitch in these things.
You're not supposed to do that.
No, and he just kept weaving in there
like really casually.
He knows what he's doing.
That's sweet of him, yeah.
So we were also there to present to
radio stations this solution, and the solution is
the transition to digital.
Now, I learned a lot just by—we had
some of our existing customers there.
We're on over 235 stations.
Well, we're more now after this week, but
already on 235 stations using Godcaster.
And they're seeing, in some cases, up to
50% of their audience moving towards streaming,
which is a lot.
That is a lot, yeah.
And everybody says our over-the-air numbers
are deteriorating.
They're going down.
And up until, you know, really—well, even still
today, what radio stations do is you go
to their website, and there's a listen live
button, you know, which just opens up a
streaming player, and there's pretty much nothing else
to do.
And they always have an on-demand section.
So they're seeing a lot of their customers
go from over-the-air to digital station
websites.
Also, every single station, almost every single one
has an app, and that's where they're seeing
the most uptake.
So I thought that was interesting because people
really— I mean, you just can't get around
the App Store solution.
People really understand apps.
Like, what's your—oh, app, okay.
And so now if they want to tune
in, they just open up the app, which
kind of validates the idea.
Also, when it comes to podcasts, wherever you
get your podcasts is a very powerful statement,
and it is definitely not so that a
lot of people get their podcasts from podcast
apps.
That was a big eye-opener for me.
And we kind of already figured that that
was the way it was going to go.
So they all have an on-demand page,
and this has really been killing them.
This has been killing these radio stations because
people will hear a program.
I'll just take Focus on the Family as
an example.
They hear it on the air, and then
Focus on the Family would say, you know,
go to Focus on the Family to support
the program.
Or people might go to the radio station
website or app, and they see the on
-demand.
If they want to listen there, they tap
on it, and all of a sudden now
they're at Focus on the Family.
The radio station has successfully driven their listener
away.
Yeah, you just did a reach around to
the, yeah.
Just sent them away.
So the business, this is what I like
about this group, and there's thousands of faith
-based radio stations.
This group, they pretty much all run on
a value-for-value model, and it's really
a sharing of revenue.
So when you're listening to a station, the
station will say, support the station.
The program, these national programs will say, you
know, support Focus on the Family.
And then, of course, the donation, the people
go to Focus on the Family to support
the programming, and then there will be a
drop-down box, where did you hear us?
Where did you hear about us?
A lot of people, or I don't know
how much, but there's also a portion of
the audience that will call the 800 number,
and the phone operator is supposed to say,
what station did you hear it on?
Based upon that data, the national programming will
share a piece of that revenue back to
the station with predictable results.
That's a long way around.
Yes, predictable.
That is not high fidelity.
Well, so they call this attribution in the
business.
So on the webpage, there's a little drop
-down box, and of course, almost nobody uses
the drop-down box, so that field comes
in empty.
So they don't know where this listener came
from, and often these phone services will just
forget to ask where the person heard about
the program.
So apparently, for the last 40 years, they've
had roundtables and forums and all kinds of
discussions about the problem of attribution.
Okay.
So we solve that in one way by
using the funding tag in all of the…
So Godcaster, you can fill up your Godcaster
player on the website and in the station
app, and if the feed doesn't have an
attribution, then we'll add the attribution link.
So you can click on Donate right there
from the station webpage instead of going away.
You can also listen to the podcast there.
And then we mark that in the station
stats as a donation button clicked for this
program, this episode, and we send off a…
What do you call that, the tag in
the URL?
A query parameter, the underscore from equals…
Yeah, the refer tag, I guess.
And the refer both, yeah.
And we also say, so what station?
Do we do by episode or program?
I can't remember.
Both, yeah.
Both.
Oh, who was that?
Who's coming in?
10,000 stats.
Thank you very much.
10,000.
No, Lincoln.
Lincoln.
Oh, Lincoln.
Lincoln, 10,000 stats.
Shout-out to Eric PP and team for
bringing Dojo to Start 9.
Absolute rock star.
Dojo.
I don't know what Dojo…
What is Dojo?
Dojo?
I don't know what Dojo is.
Trying to figure out what Dojo is.
Anyway, I'll continue.
So this solves a big part of the
problem because now the station knows that someone
clicked on the link and the program creator,
I hate the term, program producer, also knows
that it came from that station.
Now, this was like, I literally saw people's
mouths drop open.
What?
You've solved this?
And so…
It wasn't that hard, actually.
Well, here's what was interesting.
The stations loved it, but the program producers
loved it even more.
You have to understand that unlike any other
radio conference or…
I mean, this is a community.
They all want to survive and make it…
Ultimately, everybody wants to spread the gospel, but
they all want to survive, and they know
that one can't survive without the other.
So they really all want to have this
data.
So we saw program producers saying, wow, how
about this?
Why don't I tag all my programs for
each…
They have ways of tailoring the outro on
their programs.
It's a system called…
Oh, yeah.
Like a…
Dynamic ad insertion.
Yeah, like a post roll.
Exactly, a post roll.
So they all use this system called…
Well, not all, but a lot of them
use this system called AMBOSS, and so there's
a thousand tags in there, and they'll say,
thank you for listening to Focus on the
Family on WDCA or whatever.
Right.
And these guys were saying, well, we'll just
tag it saying, go to WDCA's website and
click on the donate button so that…
Smash that donate button.
Yeah, so they really got into it, and
they're like, can I have a login instead
of building a whole thing from scratch to
parse out their server logs?
They would love to have a dashboard.
And it's interesting because the station's like, yeah,
you should give them a dashboard.
So, of course, there's another business line for
us because we can now build a dashboard
and serve this as a service to the
program producers.
They all love this.
Interesting.
And they also want, well, even beyond that,
they want to know how many plays they're
getting because all they've had is the same
tired old stuff.
They got downloads, and they all said, we
got a lot of people listening in Peru,
but they never send us any donations.
Yeah.
So they all know how poor it is,
and so when they could see actual play
numbers because Godcaster has first-party data, they
all got really excited.
And then, you should write this down on
your notepad, they would love to have time
listened, which of course we can give to
them because they said, I want to know
if someone's dropping out after eight minutes in
Arizona but maybe listening all the way through
in Ohio, you know, I can make better
content based upon that.
And the beauty of this is that both
sides were happy in sharing that information.
So it was very interesting because now the
station also knows what's working, is the placement
of that program's player in the right spot.
And they all realized that just having a
sample size of a few percent is enough
to determine what's happening on all these stations
that aren't using our system.
So it was really mind-boggling to see
how something that to you and I seemed
like something pretty simple, really, really made an
impact.
Imagine that whole sort of scenario, I imagine
that that probably replays itself in like the
IAB, you know, this just sort of like
entrenched way of doing things with like Nielsen
ratings and all these kinds of, where they
just find it so hard to move, just
to just make a simple move to the
next step.
Because they don't have the data.
Yeah, or it's just like, because we look
at these, we look at these industries and
these things from the outside and we're like,
well, you know, why is it so hard
to just make a simple move like this?
And, you know, I guess it's because, I
don't know, I guess it's because...
We're the right time at the right place.
That's what's happened here.
Yeah, I guess so.
I guess you're right.
Because they all realize that they have to
turn off the generators and transmitters and pull
down the towers eventually.
How long, let me stop you real quick
and ask you on that question, how much
money does it cost to run a transmitter?
I mean, is it, how much power is
that?
You can actually, you can kind of calculate
it.
Let me see how much, let's try this.
Does it cost to run a 100, one,
two, three watt radio station in, okay.
I know the AM transmitters are extremely expensive.
But, you know, there's a whole bunch of
things that comes along with it.
Let's see, for a 100 kilowatt FM broadcast
package, transmitter cables and antennas could cost about
$40,000, but $20,000 operating costs.
So it's several thousand dollars a month.
So several thousand dollars a month just in
like electricity?
Yeah, basically, yeah.
Power.
Power, yeah.
Yeah, so that is a significant expense.
If your monthly income is $20,000 or
$25,000, I mean.
And they probably have to pay for the
license too.
Yeah, for the FCC license?
Yeah, sure, yeah.
Yeah, I wonder how much that is.
I don't know.
I mean, Sam had the right idea so
long ago with the river radio model, you
know, just distributing everything across, you know, work
from home, people in a local, in a
hyper local, and then you basically start podcast
first, and then you transmit if you want
to.
The difference is Sam was coming from a
zero starting point, had to launch a new
digital audio broadcast signal.
So he was trying to do both at
the same time, you know, building up in
a very crowded space.
Well, actually not that DAB.
I mean, everyone has DAB, but there's so
many choices because it's digital.
And these guys, they have their listeners.
They have the listeners, they have them on
broadcast, they have the listeners on streaming.
And I'd actually seen this, but a lot
of modern car radios, when you get out
of range, the car radio will say, would
you like to continue listening digital?
And the car radio will go and find
the stream, presumably in tune in, and then
we'll switch over.
And then actually, I think from that point
on, you're just listening digital and not even
listening to the broadcast signal.
I never knew.
I didn't know that was a thing.
Yeah, yeah.
I don't have it in my car, but
I have seen it before.
And so a lot of them mentioned that.
Anyway, so the point is that they all
understood the three main things, which is incorporate
your live stream into your on-demand.
And they're already seeing people no longer clicking
on the listen live button, but going into
the Godcaster.
It's the first, you know, tiles like listen
live.
So they're listening live there, and now it's
just one tap away to the program they
might want to listen to on demand, and
they can start to measure this.
What I didn't expect is how excited the
program producers would be about sharing that data.
But they actually all love it because now
they can have a real conversation about money,
you know, what's really working.
And some of these producers, some of them
buy airtime on some of the really larger
stations.
And, you know, there's a share back, and
there's all kinds of, you know, so they
also need to know, is my money being
well spent?
And I can imagine that there's probably, I
mean, even though there's probably some that are
close to accurate, I bet on balance, I
bet most of them are undercounting.
Probably.
So it would be good to see, you
know, better numbers.
I mean, if you're having to go through
this roundabout process of like calling a 1
-800 number and all this stuff to report
your list, I mean, I can't imagine you're
going to get a very good response rate.
Oh, no.
It's horrible.
And the beauty of this crowd is that
they're excited about engagement and people listening.
They don't care about the number.
So they'll see 230 plays on one of
their top programs on a Godcast they just
installed.
They're super excited because they know that each
one of those people, A, received the message
they wanted to send them, but B, you
know, that could represent a lifetime donor of
$500 a year.
So if they don't care about getting a
million or 10 million downloads, that's irrelevant to
them.
It's totally meaningless.
They all have very sophisticated CRM systems.
They want to have a donor.
They want to continue to message that donor,
et cetera.
And again, the big takeaway for me was
their listeners, and they're not all old, their
listeners are listening where they're being sent to.
So there's a relatively low number is how
I understood it that are, you know, going,
if they're hearing a focus on the family
program, they're not necessarily searching for it in
their app or subscribing to it in an
app.
They just go back to the focus on
the family website or to the radio station
website, or the radio station app is a
big one.
Most of these apps have, of course, very
poor podcast, no podcast management.
They'll just post a recent episode.
Maybe there's a couple of tiles in there
that just go from an RSS feed, and
some of them just pop you right out
of the app to the producer's page.
So, you know, it's a very inefficient way
of keeping your customer.
I wonder, this is all curious to me
because I wonder what the psychology is there
of not using a podcast app.
And let me tell you where I'm coming
from.
Like my wife, she has, she's used Overcast
for years.
She knows, you know, she's comfortable with it.
She knows how to use it.
There's nothing there on that front, but she
oftentimes just doesn't.
What does she do?
Well, she'll just, you know, just Google for
it or she'll, you know, click.
She just finds this content some other way.
Yep.
And she's even made comments before about how
she just doesn't, like, she finds the whole
idea, like, she doesn't like a podcast app
because I think it goes back to something
you said where you're like that inbox model
where sometimes podcast apps can make you feel
stressed out because you just see all these
episodes.
That you haven't listened to.
Yeah.
The un-listened to episodes.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
And it feels like work.
Yeah.
It's not an enjoyable experience.
You know, there's something different about, okay, this
is interesting because there's something different about launching,
let's say, let's say Hulu or Amazon Prime
or something like that where you have all
this content.
You don't get the same sense of stress.
You're just scrolling through seeing if there's something
you want to watch.
But podcast apps stress you out because they
make you feel like, oh, I was supposed
to do this thing and I didn't.
And, like, I think I feel the same
way because what's happened with me is, even
though, you know, I'm always going to be
an app guy, but what happened with me,
though, is, like, during all this testing of
Godcaster, you know, I've subscribed to a whole
bunch of different stations and feeds.
A lot of feeds.
And, whoa, I mean, like, my Castamatic is
blowing up.
I mean, if I opened it up, I've
got, you know, 300 episodes of Unless and
Stuff.
Yeah.
And I immediately feel this sense of stress.
And I'll go a few days at a
time without even opening the app.
Now, I know for me, I just go
in there and clean it out.
But I think maybe other people don't, maybe
they don't think about, they don't want to
babysit an app that way.
And maybe we're already, because what got me
thinking about this is, you were talking about
how they, people like the radio station app,
but they may not necessarily want a podcast
app.
But then again, the radio station app, if,
like, let's say that they're firing up like
a Godcaster or something like that, or, you
know, some kind of PWA app, then they're
just seeing sort of just the on-demand
available menu.
Yeah.
The guide, so to speak.
You're not seeing, here's all the episodes you
haven't listened to yet.
And it's curated.
Yeah.
I don't know.
That may be a, that may be a
really, that may be a significant defect to
mass adoption when it comes to podcast apps.
I completely agree.
And that is just a, it kind of
reinforced for me the reason why YouTube is
seen as a podcast place.
It's not because you need to have video.
It just isn't.
It's because, oh, it's on YouTube.
I just go there.
Boom, I've got it.
You know, if you tell someone, go listen
to this podcast at WDCA.com, people will
go there and they'll probably go back there.
That's where I get this podcast.
They don't think the way, where we're coming
from anymore.
Yeah.
You know, that this is, all podcasts are
in this app.
Because, first of all, they're not.
They're just not anymore.
Not all podcasts are in every app.
My stuff is not on Spotify.
It hasn't hurt my numbers at all.
It hasn't hurt our donations at all.
People just go somewhere else to get that
particular podcast.
So there is a change in psychology for
sure.
And that's really just the number of what
people call platforms.
Like, oh, no, I get that on Rumble.
But I get Rogan on YouTube.
And I get No Agenda on noagendashow.net.
There's a lot of people that use the
player there.
And I'm always amazed.
And I know that Tina, she's listening to
stuff just by clicking a play button on
her iPad all the time.
The only time she uses Fountain is when
she wants to send a boost.
Well, see, Melissa sent me a thing the
other day to listen to an interview.
And she sent it to me.
And it was like a link to somebody's
Substack webpage.
Another place to get a podcast.
Yeah.
And so I'm like, well, you know, because
this is just something that's not in...
It's just not in a traditional podcast app.
You know, we had this idea with the...
Not the idea, but I mean, we had
this conviction with the News River that...
Yeah.
Freedom Controller.
With Freedom Controller.
Yeah, that we didn't want it to be
an inbox style thing.
That we just wanted to be this, you
know, sort of river of news style.
And yeah, maybe inboxes just, you know, maybe
that idea is showing its age.
Well, I think so.
I think there's a...
We've seen a massive shift from people using
email and corporations to using Slack.
Although that has its own stressful issues because
you can see how many unread messages there
are.
People are using Telegram groups.
And they're missing stuff.
But, you know, because Telegram group is basically
a river of news, a river of posts.
You're never going to scroll back very far
in that thing.
No.
Because it's just a pain in the butt
to do it.
No, and people repost stuff.
You can catch up and you still have
your ads and all that and your replies
and stuff like that.
Well, you know, we all have like...
I bet every single one of us has,
let's say, three podcasts that we just don't
want to miss.
And the rest of them, we're more like,
eh, if I miss them, it's okay.
I'll just pick it up next time.
You know, I'll jump back in some other
time.
But there may be just like maybe two
or three that we really do want to
listen to every episode.
And if that's the case, it's really not
that hard to like go to the website.
And I bet it's easy for people to
fall back into that thing of like, I'll
just go listen to that thing.
I mean, that's what I end up doing
with...
Like America This Week has a live stream
every Monday night on YouTube.
And every Tuesday morning, I go to the
Fire Up YouTube and start listening to the
previous night's live stream.
And it's not...
I mean, I got to go to a
different app to do it, but I do
it.
So this whole thing reminds me of the
movie A Song is Born, which you've probably
not seen.
I've seen it twice.
It's from 1948.
Is that the one with Barbra Streisand?
No, that's A Star is Born.
No, A Song is Born stars Danny Kaye.
Oh, Danny Kaye.
Yes.
Well, so I'll read the...
I actually pulled up the Wikipedia page.
I'll read you the first paragraph here.
In the Totten Foundation's Victorian mansion in New
York City, mild-mannered professor Hobart Frisbee, that's
Danny Kaye, and his seven fellow academics are
writing and recording a comprehensive musical encyclopedia.
They've been living cut off from the world
for nine years, living without a radio.
And so then these two window washers, seeking
help with a radio quiz, they discover that
this group, who's been writing this full-on
comprehensive musical encyclopedia, but have been cut off
the world for nine years, without their knowledge,
swing, jive, jump, blues, Dixie, boogie-woogie, bebop,
all of this has exploded.
And they didn't even know about it.
Oh, I get it.
You see the analogy?
Yeah.
Where we've been very heads down and concerned
about video, but video wasn't really the issue.
It's people no longer seeing their podcast app
as the only place to get podcasts, because
I can get them here, I can get
them there.
So the question is, what interfaces can you
build that work for that certain audience?
And I come right back to, okay, this
is God casters listening to a radio station,
but there's also the Rachel Maddow universe where
you need to have something else, including cross
-app comments on Blue Cry, whatever.
And this was completely apparent when I did
my second keynote, which was the future of
podcasting.
The first keynote was called what?
The future of radio.
Future of radio, okay, and the second was
future of podcasting.
Yes.
Now, I started off by saying, I made
very clear that local is a huge market
that has been untapped and unserved, and everyone's
like, oh, yeah, wow, hadn't thought of that
one.
Then I took your Dallas PowerPoint and I
deleted some stuff and I made it a
little less technical here and there and added
some screenshots.
By the way, I learned an important lesson.
When you are using PowerPoint and then on
your own laptop you switch to a browser
to demonstrate something, that does not show up
on the screens that are looking at the
PowerPoint.
Not if you're in presentation mode, that is
for sure.
Well, I didn't know that.
Okay.
And I'm like, look how cool this is,
and I'm like, ah.
And then Daniel J.
Lewis was sitting in the front row.
He's like, Adam, it's not showing on the
screen.
Thank you, Daniel J.
Lewis.
That was awesome.
The savior.
Yeah.
So I had to quit out of presentation
mode, show the browser, then go back to
presentation mode.
So it was a lot of alt-tabbing
around, but got through it.
Okay.
And every single feature I showed, there were,
you know, it was like this.
And then we have these things called crowd
chapters.
Cloud chapters.
You know, and even, you know, the funding
tag, like, you know, you can actually have
a support button right here.
You know, people just like audible gasps, audible
gasps.
And I also showed value for value.
I mean, people loved it.
And, you know, no one had any problems
with Satoshis or Bitcoin.
You know, they just saw money going because
they understand value for value.
This is what this crowd is.
And afterwards, that was the most exciting part.
You know, there's always a line of like
10 people who want to come and talk
to you.
And they said, you know, I use Buzzsprout.
And I'd seen this feature, but I didn't
really know what it did.
Oh, interesting.
And it shows you about the education the
hosting companies are or are not doing.
I'm not saying they're not educating, but it's
not getting through to everybody.
It's not getting through.
Yeah.
And so a lot of them were saying,
OK, so I could make my own interface
using these features and they'll all show up.
Yes, you can.
And or you can tell people to use
a different app.
This group really got it.
They really did.
And who was your audience here?
Was this still radio stations in the room
or was this podcasters?
Radio stations, I would say program producers.
Every person who produces a program for these
radio stations, these syndicated programmers, they all have
a podcast.
And so now they're thinking, how can I
make my environment more interesting?
And how can I make it more interesting
on the stations?
Because the stations ultimately, whether they're over the
air or streaming live, people are listening to
them and they're telling people what's coming.
They're promoting the programming.
They're saying, go listen to it on demand.
So, again, that's the beauty of this group
is they're not like, I want it all.
No, they need the station to be promoting
them as much as they promote themselves.
Because when the station promotes them, then people
are much more or not much more are
very willing to support the programming and the
station because it's explained that way.
You know, support our station, support the programming.
So I'm seeing a lot of customization coming
in from the content producers who are going
to say, support me in this manner, i
.e. click on the funding button, the donation
button, which is kind of a call to
action for any podcast app developers who don't
have that, who don't surface that.
And by the way, why wouldn't you, as
an app developer, track that and reach out
to people?
I mean, you can replicate that system that
we put in there.
You know, that's not that hard.
And of course, a lot of the stations,
they want to have this functionality in their
own app.
They want to be a podcast app for
the programming that they have relationships with along
with their live stream.
So, I mean, the meetings we had were
people just literally going, wow, I can't believe
you solved this.
This is the future for us.
This is the way we got to go.
And very often you'd have like an older
guy, you know, mid-60s to mid-70s
who started the station.
It's the owner.
And a lot of them have, you know,
own multiple stations and certainly tens of repeaters,
which they all localize.
And then maybe a somewhat younger 40 to
50 general manager or program director.
And it would be the older station owner
who's saying, this is the way.
Local content, drive them towards a website, drive
them towards our app, make all the numbers
available to everybody so that we can all
get the support we need and have the
tide rise all boats.
It was a phenomenal, phenomenal experience to see
people kind of seeing for the first time
what podcasting 2.0 features can do.
Interesting.
And podcasting in general.
But the 2.0 features, that kind of
was the extra special sauce, particularly the funding
tag.
I'm having my...
And by the way, let me just say,
when we talk about Christian programming, I want
people to know that Glenn Beck is Christian
programming.
All right.
It's Christian worldview.
It's not all, oh, Jesus.
Oh, Lordy.
It's not all sermons.
I mean, it's programs you've probably listened to.
Charlie Kirk, you know, totally contemporary Christian radio
programming.
Charlie Kirk crosses over way beyond that.
So, you know, there's big, big, big shows
that are in this arena, both broadcast and
they all podcast.
Did you talk to any of the publishers?
What do you mean?
I mean, like people like Focus on the
Family.
Yeah.
That's what I call the program producers.
Oh, OK.
I see what you mean.
I thought you're talking about a job title.
You're talking about the actual...
No, the publisher.
Oh, yeah.
No.
Those are the ones who are so excited.
They're like, I'm going to change.
I'm going to do local tags.
I want to drive people towards the app.
Tell them to click on the donation button
at the station, you know, because they still
get the numbers.
They don't really care.
You know, they're not trying to, you know,
take the listener away from the station.
They have to work with the station because
the station brings the new listeners in, promotes
them continuously.
Now, the one other thing that was interesting...
You could say that the station is their
biggest advocate.
It's their pod role.
The station is their pod role.
That's exactly what it is.
It's their pod role.
And the station can also recommend stuff.
And, you know, there was many, many ideas.
Many ideas.
The thing that...
As an interesting side note, I was talking
to my buddy Matt Mundt, and I met
him in Nashville.
I met him in Dallas and in Nashville,
two different occasions.
And he's there.
And then he does social media for contemporary
Christian music artists.
So Matthew West being the most notable, but
he does many, many campaigns for people.
And so music programming has become pretty much
consolidated into one station called K-Love.
The other network of music stations owned by
Salem Broadcasting, they just recently sold all their
music stations to K-Love.
Because, you know, when you're just playing music,
you know, it's hard to, you know, do
a donation drive and get people to support
you.
And the cost of running the transmitters was
just too much.
K-Love, they are a monster.
I don't know how many, they may have
a thousand stations.
They own the Christian, contemporary Christian music space.
And they also stream.
But they own all these transmitters.
And the end result is that they do
about $300 million a year in revenue.
K-Love does?
Oh, yeah.
And they're very sophisticated because they have a
ministry.
And they, you know, they have all kinds
of trips and cruises.
And, you know, they know what they're doing.
Let me put it this way.
They really know what they're doing.
The problem is they're a nonprofit.
That's not a problem for them.
But they pay very low ASCAP BMI fees.
And all of these artists now really only
have one outlet.
It's K-Love.
And they're not making much money at all.
And then they look at K-Love and
say, well, K-Love makes $300 million a
year.
And they make it off of my music.
And I'm not really getting anything.
This is the spiritual Spotify effect.
And, of course, these artists have the same
issue with Spotify.
They don't make money off of Spotify either.
Right, right.
So this is starting to snowball where now
K-Love, they've built this $100 million building
in Nashville.
And the artists can just come there to
perform.
They've got big studios, sound stages.
And I would say 25, maybe 30%
of all the CCM hits right now are
written by Matthew West.
It's just his time.
And, you know, so he looks at this
building and says, okay, after going to this
building, I've got to perform like a monkey.
And I just don't get anything out of
it.
So I was talking to Matt Mundt and
he says what this is snowballing into is
the record labels, they no longer need national
promotion people.
So the record labels are starting to shut
down.
You know, the industry has been so consolidated,
which is never good.
I don't care if it's for Jesus or
not.
It's never good for an industry to be
consolidated in that manner.
And there is a strong interest in value
for value music.
I actually showed some of that in my
2.0 demo.
There's a strong interest in alternative methods.
And I'm exploring that.
I'm not sure how that's going to come
out.
If we can get a Matthew West to
put a value for value song up, big
deal.
You know, but there's people look and certainly
the newer artists who can't even get a
label now anymore because what does a label
get out of it?
You know, they're not getting much either.
You know, of course, probably why the labels
does kind of stopped.
The labels have really just stopped like generating
new artists and are really focused on buying
older back catalogs of stuff now, just as
sort of like, you know, annuities.
Well, but that's the publishers, the label.
So often the label is an arm of
the publishing company.
And so what the labels are now doing
is they're just out there and they'll say,
Oh, you got some pretty good songs.
How many followers do you have?
If you don't have a million followers on
your social media, they're not going to sign
you.
Yeah, this is specifically TikTok.
TikTok, it's mandatory.
I mean, even movie actors these days, it's
mandatory that they have a TikTok and an
Instagram account.
They have to post.
That's all part of what used to be
the labels job has now become the artist
job.
And so artists, of course, are seeing that
it makes more sense.
Well, why do I need these guys?
So if I can get to a couple
of them and I can show them, Hey,
this is the new way forward.
And I can point to successes such as
Boostergram Ball Live and, you know, the Skirmish
and Behind the Schemes.
And Ellen Beetz also showed Ellen Beetz, you
know, talked about all these different things.
And people were just blown away.
They had no idea that this was all
possible.
So we're making an inroad.
Yeah, that contract between that old sort of
contract between the label and the...
It's meaningless.
It's gone.
It's broken.
It's a broken...
It doesn't work that way anymore.
So we still need, you know, we still
need wallets.
We still need things to work, but there's
definitely an excitement.
There's a hunger or a thirst for new
ways to do it.
And just being there in that capacity, I
have a lot of people to follow up
on.
So I'm very excited about it.
And then Daniel Day-Lewis had a little
chat with him, and he reiterated.
He said, man, you need to be the
leader of Podcasting 2.0. And I said,
I'm not so sure.
I'm not so sure that, you know, A,
I don't think it's...
Until we have people branching out in different
arenas with receiving side, doing different types of
things, that's our...
This comes back to the Song is Born
movie.
You know, we've been a little cloistered, and
we need to expand our listening experiences.
So, you know, a company like PodPage, you
know, they have an interesting opportunity because they're
basically creating podcast receiving stations inside their websites.
I mean, and, you know, True Fans is
thinking so far out of the box now.
Yeah, True Fans.
And by the way, think about the activity
stream that Sam is implementing.
That's the kind of stuff that stations as
well as producers want to see.
That's fantastic.
They love that stuff.
Yeah.
Yeah, for sure.
Yeah, I think this becomes like...
Yeah, that inbox-style app.
Man, I don't know.
It may be...
It's time to rethink that, I think.
Yes.
That's been abundantly clear to me.
It is time to...
And, you know, you can call it white
labeling, but, you know, I've said before, pick
a group, pick a demographic.
Why is Fountain successful?
Their demographic is Nostra and Bitcoin.
Well, do you want to talk about images
real quick?
Oh, you know, I'm so excited, David.
I'm so excited about images.
I've tried to follow the threads on podcastindex
.social, and the conversation was so exciting to
me.
I know.
You're dripping with sarcasm.
Yes, I am.
Because there's so much, you know, like noodling
and rib-jabbing, and like...
It was a little bit of...
So, yeah, set us straight, PodSage.
This...
Okay.
I mean, I think it's a good transition,
because if...
It makes...
Listening to this makes this tag feel even
more necessary.
Because now you want...
If app experiences are going to be broader
than just an inbox style with a piece
of episode art, then, like, you're going to
have to be able to deliver other artwork
assets, right?
To make a bigger...
And now it's time for some hot namespace
talk.
Yeah, baby.
We need something else besides just an image.
And I want to say, I said right
at the end of that sentence.
That's pretty bad, yeah.
To my knowledge, I don't think I've ever
done that before, and I think it was
appropriate in the context, but it's still concerning.
It's very concerning.
If I do that again, you better call
me down.
I'll call you out.
I want an immediate hammer blow.
Let me just run where we're at real
quick.
How did we get here?
So Russell from Pod2 down under has this
podcast banner tag.
Podcast colon banner.
And it does exactly what it says.
It defines a banner image.
Banner being something that's longer than it is
tall, wider than it is high.
Right.
That an app can display.
That's the idea here.
And so when you think of banner image,
think of something that's, like, at the top
of Facebook, your Facebook timeline, or at the
top of your Mastodon, or at the top
of your Twitter.
Some wide but shallow image.
And so Russell created this thing, and he's
using it, and that's the thing that exists.
In the RSS world, so let's just dive
in.
What I'm doing right now is just diving
into podcast image delivery, okay?
In the RSS 2.0 native world, there's
an image tag, which has always been sort
of a weird thing to me.
It's just a weird tag.
I don't understand what Weiner was smoking when
he created this, because it's got, like, it's
got child nodes that are, like, link and
title.
And the spec even says that they should
be, that the title and the link should
be the same as they are in the
channel.
Yeah.
And then it has max.
The spec defines a maximum width up to,
like, 144 pixels or something.
The whole thing is just super weird.
And I'm sure that's why Apple created their
own image tag.
It was because that one was just almost
unusable.
And so the iTunes namespace has an image
tag, and it's only used for channel art
or episode art, and that's going to be
square art, sort of a one-by-one
aspect ratio.
All the tag has is an href, so
all it does is reference a URL of
an image somewhere on the Internet.
Then in the documentation for the tag, they
give you their sizing requirements.
So minimum of 1,400 by 1,400,
maximum of 3,000 by 3,000.
So stick a pin in that.
We're going to come back around to this
in a minute.
Then you have the media namespace, what's called
the media thumbnail tag, which defines a thumbnail
image.
I mean, it's in the name, and it
also, the spec describes it as such, and
it says it has, like for instance, it
has a time attribute in it where you
can give a timestamp to reference a time
code in the media enclosure, referencing which keyframe
the thumbnail was taken from.
Right.
So this is a way to say, okay,
here's an enclosure, and this image represents a
thumbnail from that enclosure.
This is what you're going to see when
you hit play.
So that's kind of the overview there.
So the art defined, like if you think
of art in the RSS-based podcasting, really
you're talking about other than a thumbnail, you're
talking about square channel or episode art.
I mean, that's what we're dealing with.
And the RSS, you know, either using the
RSS tag itself or the iTunes image tag,
and then there's the banner tag defined by
Russell.
So into this sort of mindset came the
podcast images tag a few years ago.
The podcast namespace, the podcast colon images tag
assumed this paradigm that you would have square
channel art because that's all we had.
And it just tweaked it.
It tweaked it to allow the delivery of
multiple sizes and widths of art instead of
just one.
So you could now define a set of
images and say, okay, this one's 512 pixels
wide.
This one's 1024.
This one's 1400.
This one's 3000.
And so the idea there is the app
could choose which image is most appropriate for
its presentation.
So like you could have a small KaiOS
phone screen or like a big monster iPhone
Pro Max screen.
And you're just going to pick whatever, the
app's going to pick whatever is the most
appropriate.
That was the idea.
And so then James stepped into this conversation
a while back and said that the images
tag was, to quote him, not fit for
purpose, unquote.
Whatever that means.
I don't really want to get into all
that because he was very upset with me
this week for reasons I don't fully understand.
But I'll just say that we have a
disagreement about that.
But saying that I don't agree with him
is not the same as saying that I
don't think that I don't see a need
to change it.
Because James' point was that the image tag,
James' point that the image tag is not
good enough is still valid even if we
don't come about it through the same steps.
So I'm willing to accept that.
So we're left with this need for a
tag that can deliver images for different purposes.
That's really where we're at now.
So, for instance, like a hero banner.
So what you might call, what Apple might
call, what Apple does call a channel logo.
And that's Apple's terminology.
So it's something that looks sort of like
a banner, kind of.
Or perhaps like dark mode, light mode channel
art, okay?
Yep, yep.
Or an open graph wide card that's going
to get displayed as a preview image when
you post to Twitter.
These are all different possible...
All different versions, yeah, of course, of course.
Different types of art that you may want
to deliver in your feed.
Because at this point...
So you're going to control your branding at
this point.
You're going to say, here's, you know, like
to whatever degree you want to, you're going
to say, okay, I've got 17 different assets
here, image assets, and I want to deliver
these along with my feed so that an
app can receive it and know exactly all
the different possible ways to show my branding
to the user.
That's kind of the best I can explain
it.
Makes sense.
So Nathan proposed modifying the podcast colon images
tag.
And you as project leader completely ignored him,
you horrible person.
That's what I do.
I'm the ignorer in chief, yes.
So Nathan proposed modifying the images tag.
Let me just, on that topic, just because
something doesn't immediately get acted upon doesn't mean
that it's not the same as ignoring it.
Like, it just came back up.
Yeah.
It just came back up.
No human being can address everything at all
times.
I mean, it's just not possible.
There's not enough bandwidth to the human mind
to solve problems on 25 different fronts at
once.
Things have to be ignored or set aside
or come back to later.
I hate that sometimes people feel that way.
But it's just life.
So Nathan proposed modifying the podcast colon images
tag to serve this purpose.
Okay.
And let's look at it real quick.
So the proposal here is to
add, what he's saying is add to the
current source set attribute, which is the attribute
that existed before.
Add a bunch of other options, a bunch
of other attributes.
Source would be required.
Source set would become optional.
And the attributes would be as follows.
Alt, which is what we're all familiar with,
with the HTML image tag.
It would just define some fallback text if
the image can't be seen or shown.
There would be an aspect ratio attribute.
There would be a purpose attribute, and that
would be just a text-based purpose.
There would be a source attribute, straight up
just linked to an image.
And there would be a type, so something
like image slash JPEG or video slash MP4
or something like that.
So the thing that's interesting here and makes
this different from what you would expect from
just a normal image tag is this purpose
idea.
I asked for this, and then he took
it in sort of an interesting direction.
And this is where some of the problem,
not a problem, but some of the confusion
and concern has come from, as expressed by
Stephen B.
Yes, I saw that.
True.
And I want to say this.
Stephen and Nathan are so pleasant to talk
through this stuff with because it's just like
it's sticking to the point and getting everybody's
cards out on the table, and there's very
little ego that gets involved in this wonderful.
So the purpose here, and Nathan gives a
few examples, could be something like, we mentioned
Apple's channel logo, so it could be something
like Apple dash channel dash logo.
Now, I'm just spitballing making these up.
I'm not trying to be super specific.
And the idea here is that you would
pass through this purpose from one platform through
to the app.
This sort of pass-through approach where you're
saying instead of defining all of the allowable
image metrics and use cases inside our own
tag and spec, why don't we take the
MIME type approach, why don't we take it
one step further and use the purpose attribute
to pass the platform's intent through to the
app.
So podcasting has sort of three spheres.
If you think about it, it's got hosting
providers, Buzzsprout, RSS.com, Blueberry, blah, blah, blah,
podcast player apps, TrueFans, Podverse, Fountain, et cetera,
and third-party platforms.
Episodes.fm, Podnews, Podcast.tech, Podpage, Podcaster, on
and on.
So you have sort of three different spheres
here of interest in what is happening in
different deliveries going back and forth.
So instead of saying in our spec, a
banner is a three-to-one aspect ratio
with a minimum of 2850 wide, instead you
could say purpose equals Apple channel logo.
Then if the app knows that an Apple
channel logo, knows what an Apple channel logo's
image constraints are and wants to deliver an
asset somewhere in its UI that looks like
that, then it can choose to consume that
image.
Or ignore.
Right, and if it doesn't know about it,
or if it doesn't want to display something
like that, it can ignore it.
So that's sort of where he took that
purpose idea.
It's very different.
It's kind of unique in one way, but
it's not like we're totally unused to this.
No, we have that with Medium, we have
it with all kinds of stuff, don't we?
Well, see, this feels more like MIME types
to me.
Because what you're saying is, with a MIME
type, you're saying, okay, the MIME type is
MPEG slash audio.
Well, we know what that means, but we
don't know what that means because the HTML
spec defines it.
We know what that means because the MIME
type leads us to the MP3 spec that
defines what that means.
And so it's sort of like a standard
that points to a different standard.
But instead of what's happening here, it's a
little bit of a different use of that.
And it's not necessarily a standard pointing to
a different standard, it's a standard pointing to
a provider's documentation of what they want.
And that's a little bit different than what
we're used to, I think.
And I think that's...
The funny thing is that from my perspective,
it all made perfect sense to me.
I don't understand why it was an issue
because I'm like, yeah, that makes sense.
I want to use it for this, I
want to use it for that.
I don't want to, I don't use it.
I think I understand.
We had this discussion on the podcast index
social.
And I think it's really important.
I want people to listen to me right
here.
I am simply talking out loud right now
and thinking these things through because these are
new ideas.
I'm not at the point of saying that
I think we should do any particular one
thing.
I really am just thinking all of this
out loud.
That's what the boardroom is for, is to
just bat this stuff around.
So don't get too hung up on any
one particular thing.
But I think it's important to think about
directives versus descriptives.
If you think about the HTML spec, the
image tag in the HTML specification, that's a
directive.
That image tag is not telling, when you
include a width and a height in the
image tag of HTML, it is not telling
you that that image is that wide and
that high.
It's telling you when you show it on
the screen, show it in this width and
this height.
The image that it's referencing could be something
completely different.
And you can see that when you put
a 16x9 image and then you put it
in an image tag in HTML that's one
by one.
It just gets all squished up and looks
terrible.
So that's a directive.
What we're talking about and what we're assuming
that RSS feeds are going to want to
deliver are things that are descriptive.
When the podcast colon images tag tells you
the width and the height, we assume that
it's telling us what the image is.
And that's a little bit different because it
sort of changes your mindset as the app
developer.
You're saying, okay, I know I'm going to
be getting an image that's this shape and
this size.
Then what can I do with it?
And so that's when I say that now
there's these purposes.
The purposes are there because you're being described
to what this thing is supposed to be.
And that's helpful.
Think about if you're an app developer and
you just get an image in the feed
and here's what you get.
You get URL, width, height, aspect ratio.
What is that?
Right.
What do you do with it?
I don't know.
You have no idea.
No.
It doesn't tell you anything.
And if we go into the spec and
say, okay, anytime you receive an image that's
three to one aspect ratio, that's going to
be this thing.
Well, every now and then it may not
be because that doesn't stop people from putting
whatever they want to in there.
But if you have an image that has
a purpose of X, Y, Z, now at
least you can see it and say, oh,
okay, well, this is telling me that it's
supposed to be a hero image.
And I know what that is.
What is a hero image?
Because I've never heard that term before this
conversation.
It's like a big thing at the top
of a website that's sort of like a
background graphic.
That actually has the name hero image?
I've never heard that before.
Yeah.
Let's see.
A term used to describe the full screen
video.
Oh, web design.
Above the fold page.
I've never heard about that.
Okay.
Yeah.
And so you can see, we want to
make these rich image-filled experiences.
So you need more to go on.
What if somebody gives you, what if somebody
gives you a 3,000 pixel wide, 1
,000 pixel tall picture of themself?
And what they intended it for was like
an avatar.
Right.
But you don't know what to do with
it.
Yeah.
So I think, so Stephen is concerned about
interrupting complexity.
And I respect that.
And I want to think about that.
And I want us all to think about
that.
I mean, a tag doesn't have to define
everything about itself as long as it references
sort of appropriate definitions that can be found
in other places.
So like the enclosure tag.
The enclosure tag has a mime type in
it.
We know that somewhere off on the internet,
there's a mime.
We can go find whatever that mime type
is if we needed to.
And, you know, I don't think Stephen's opposed
to this, to that necessarily.
If I had to sum up his concern,
I think it's that he feels the weight
of like too many of these indirect references
to other things that if he's like, well,
I got to go look up this thing
and this thing and this thing and this
thing and I got to, that it's just
sort of like it's going to make your
brain spin and it's going to become too
complicated to try to accept all these different
things.
And there's also like implementation difficulty.
I'm sympathetic to that.
If it's just an overly complex, then it
can be a real barrier to adoption.
I mean, a tag like this needs to
be, okay, so it needs to be fully
usable with just like a minimum of attributes.
So I guess here's my current thoughts at
this moment about it.
Names of things don't matter, but we might
need to rename this tag to avoid just
confusion and to make a clean break with
the podcast colon images.
We may need to just say, okay, this
thing is not called podcast colon images.
This thing is called podcast colon image and
just start fresh.
That way we can drop the source set
attribute and then go move and we will
push the podcast images tag to some sort
of deprecated appendix of the namespace.
You know, that's probably, I think a good
thing to do.
And then also choosing to not account for
optional attributes is kind of the same as
ignoring certain tags you don't support.
So if like in Steven's case, like if
Steven doesn't want to take on like the
complexity of the purpose attribute, it is optional.
And he could just choose to ignore that
and say, okay, I'm only going to process
images using just aspect ratio, width and height.
And I'm going to just, that's what I'm
going to look at.
And to me, that's really not much different
than saying, if we're talking about optional attributes,
that's not much difference than saying, I'm going
to support the social interact tag, but I'm
not going to support the chapters tag.
I mean, you're just sort of, you're just
ignoring the thing that you don't want to
consume because it's backwards compatible down to just
an image, just an image href.
I mean, really at its barest bones, if
you think about, let's say we took Nathan's
tag, rename it to podcast colon image.
It's usable just with an href.
So at that point, it's semantically equivalent to
the iTunes image tag.
Now you can, now you add the ability
to have an aspect ratio, a width and
a height.
Okay, now you've stepped up the possible power
of this tag to now be able to
encompass these other things that are desired.
Then you add to that, you can go
one step further and consume purpose.
Now you've gone into the realm of, I'm
looking at other people's, I'm looking at other
specifications in the podcast world like Apple's spec,
Spotify's spec, YouTube's spec, looking at what their
art direction says and choosing whether or not
to consume things that adhere to that.
Now I think that's sort of three, if
you look at it that way, that is
three layers of complexity that you can step
up or down to as an app developer
depending on how far you want to go.
And so I think, because what's your other
alternative?
The other alternative is for us to start
defining these particular pixel ratios and widths.
When you see these in the wild, it's
this thing.
Now just, see, that's not the way these
other things are defined.
Like what Apple says, I'm just going to
use Apple as an example.
Apple doesn't say that a 2850 by 750
image is a banner.
They say a banner is 2850 by 750.
See, I mean, that's a huge distinction.
Do you get what I'm saying?
I do.
I'm baffled why this is so complicated, why
there's a kind of religion around how this
should work.
I can see the analogy to the MIME
type.
I can see everything you're seeing.
I'm not a software developer, so that makes
it easy for me to say.
I'm not confused by why this is hard
because I think it actually is hard.
I think it actually is difficult because you're
trying to solve for a problem that has
two opposing sides to it and you're always
going to fall a little afoul one way
or another.
You know, you're going to make it a
little, it's going to be a little messy
and complicated on one side or it's going
to be weak, you know, too weak on
the other side.
And so it's like, I mean, I truly
am sympathetic to the difficulty here because that
description really is the heart of the problem.
And that's what it comes down to is
you either have to define the spec as
here's a banner, I'm just using banner as
an example, here's a banner and a banner
is this metric or here's this metric and
that means it's a banner.
There's a tension between those two things and
one is much easier, but one is an
easier spec, but it's error prone.
The other one is more difficult, but it's
more rigid and you're more, it's almost like
in programming terms having strict typing and compile
time checking versus, you know, loose non-typing.
It's easier to program in an untyped language,
but on a typed language, once you compile
it, you know that thing's going to run.
If it compiles, it runs.
And so there's a trade-off there and
I think that's what we're running into.
I don't know the actual answer to it
yet, but I think we can work it
out and get a good spec out of
it mostly because I really believe that the
people who are involved in trying to get
it done, I just think that they're capable
people who are going to get it done.
I'm not so sure, Dave.
I love your confidence.
I'm sure we can work this out.
I'm sure we can.
And I'm going to have to stop you
there, brother, because I got to get you
out in time.
Oh, Lord, it's 1.57. Yes, yes, yes.
I'm just talking and talking.
Yeah, well, we both talked.
I don't even have time for a song.
It's crazy.
Oh, sorry, man.
No, that's okay.
Listen, everybody.
Wow, this has been an intense board meeting.
This is good.
Well, it's intense.
It's intense, yeah, because there's a lot of
stuff to think about.
We're rattling cages here with inbox discussions and
this image stuff.
I think it's going to turn out great
when we have agreement on it.
It always turns out great.
Ultimately, we're value for value.
Help keep the servers running on the podcast
index.
You can do that in multiple ways by
going to podcastindex.org.
Down at the bottom, you'll see a red
donate button.
You can use that to send your PayPal
to us.
That's highly appreciated.
Of course, we encourage using a modern podcast
app.
Go to podcastapps.com and sending us a
boost.
We got a couple of boosts.
There's one coming in right now.
Cole McCormick, 1111.
Love you guys, he says.
Podcasting is intense.
Yes, indeed.
420 stats from Cannabis Records.
I see what you did there.
Preview art is very important for us.
On a marketing perspective, would love to see
that on the images tag.
There you go.
1107 from Salty Crayon.
Howdy, boardroom.
Tomorrow at noon to sometime late in the
evening, local V4V artists in downtown Waco.
Battle of the bands.
Yes, that's going to be good.
That'll be streamed live, I presume.
Go podcasting.
54321, no, 5432 from Dreb Scott.
Boosted McBoost boost, hashtag go podcasting.
Cannabis Records again now with 4,200 stats.
Just checking in on the boardroom.
The tech solutions here are mind-blowing.
You bet.
We did the 10,000 from Lincoln.
Did the shout-out to Eric PP for
bringing Dojo to start nine.
I got to go check that out.
2112 from Eric PP.
He says, 2112 for episode 212.
Thank you.
That's a show number boost expanded.
1234 from Dreb Scott with his pre-show
boost.
And 123 from Salty Crayon who confirmed the
bat signal.
Appreciate that.
And we are straight.
Oh, wait, who do I have here?
Let this come in.
420 from Lyceum.
Let me see when this came in.
Did this come in recently?
Four hours ago.
No, I'll leave that for, you have it
on your list, I'm sure.
Yeah, go ahead.
Give us the list, Dave.
This is going to be the, I'm going
to do the PayPals because they're mixed up.
I didn't have time to print them.
We got, I'll do them all together.
Cone Gloss Buck, $5.
Thank you.
Appreciate that.
James Sullivan, $10.
Christopher Reamer, $10.
Michael Kimmerer, $5.33. Dreb Scott, $15.
Chris Bernardik, $5.
And then we had a one-off from
Daniel Noblog.
He says, I've been, it's $20.
Thank you.
Thank you, Daniel.
He says, I've been having fun building a
podcast web app with your API.
Thanks for running this project.
Oh, let us know what it is.
We want to check it out.
Yeah, absolutely.
And 99% of people who use the
index never donate, so it's always appreciated.
It might be 99.5, actually.
Yeah, right.
And we got some booster grams.
We got anonymous podcast guru user.
I love that guy, 2222.
Nice row of ducks.
He says, thanks for being there, even when
someone doesn't feel good.
Enjoy the podcasting 2.0 updates with a
professional but enjoyable casual way.
Bruce from the ugly quacking duck.
Let's see.
Oh, we got, let me see if I've
got Martin Lindeskog.
I don't have Martin Lindeskog.
You want to read him?
Do I have Martin Lindeskog?
You said you thought I may have him.
No, no.
It's a lyceum.
Oh, I do.
Yes, yes.
He says, 420 stats.
I am flying high at this moment.
I am now listed on the Superfans chart
as number four, as being a superfan of
the Mere Mortals Conversations, Mutton Meat & Music,
Mere Mortals Book Reviews, Into the Dorfelverse, Diabetic
Reel, and Disco Swag, a tune by the
Dorfels.
I have achieved 8,213 points according to
truefans.fm slash fans.
Total listen time, one day, 16 hours and
11 minutes.
I have paid 58,019 satoshis.
Where will I be on April 20th?
Martin Lindeskog.
High five for him, podcast.
Lyceum on truefans.
All right, Martin.
Very nice.
See, that's what Sam's doing something interesting there.
He's giving people bonus points and all kinds
of things.
I like it.
Very cool.
Gamification.
Yes, that's what we call it.
Brian of London, 10,948.
Sass through Castomatic.
He says, podcasting 2.0 has been so
successful, it's become part of the background.
Podping is a brand-new internet protocol for
notifications without any central control of the infrastructure.
Infrastructure.
We've barely even touched the future uses.
Thank you, Brian.
I will tell you, I showed the tiles
.podping.org during my presentation.
Did you?
Oh, yeah.
Then I said right up front, now, you
don't know what could come through.
The images you see may not be safe
for this room, but luckily it was okay.
But people were just like, whoa, what is
this?
And I said, yeah, that's podcasting 2.0
features updating in real time.
They were very blown away by that.
CommaStreetBlogger, 18,720 through Fountain.
He says, howdy, fellow Bitcoin bros, Adam and
Dave.
I am hobby cartoonist.
That's my main hobby.
So today I want to promote some of
my stuff.
My cartoons can be found at www.csb
.lol. There is RSS feed there.
And please follow me on X at handle
at csb.
Yes, just three letters, C, S, and B.
I bought that handle from a guy in
Portugal a long time ago.
And on the Fediverse at csb at poa
.st. On an extreme free speech instance, poa
.st. Yo, CSB.
Wow.
Yes, that is quite the extreme free speech
instance.
Oh, yeah.
Whenever you get a mention from someone on
poa.st, it's usually not good.
You just run to the hills.
And then you mute, mute, mute.
Yeah.
No, I actually never mute anybody.
I'm interested to see what people, I may
not respond, but I don't mute people.
I want to see what they're saying.
I'm interested.
I don't get triggered.
That's it.
Oh, thank you all so much.
Thank you.
That is a beautiful group.
We appreciate you so much.
Thank you very much, boardroom, for being here
with us and for continuing the conversation at
podcastindex.social. We'll get through this, people.
There is a very bright future.
Just remember that we've been writing the encyclopedia
while not listening to everything that's happening on
the outside.
And so, hope you're able to gain some
wisdom from this Boots on the Ground report.
Now, is this, is A Song is Born,
is that a movie that should be watched
or is it a movie that should just
be talked about?
I would recommend watching it, actually.
It's quite interesting.
It's a cute movie.
There's cute girls in it.
Yeah.
Okay.
Danny K, man, how can you go wrong?
It's Danny K, everybody.
He's perfect.
That dude can dance.
Yes.
Thank you very much, Dave, and feel better,
brother.
I hope you get through this very quickly.
Thanks, man.
And thank you so much, boardroom.
We appreciate you.
We will return next Friday to bring you
another episode of the one and only Podcasting
2.0. Why
is that so cool?
You have been listening to Podcasting 2.0.
Visit podcastindex.org for more information.
Go podcasting!
I want an immediate hammer blow.